I had this option to bridge on a recent deal but decided to pass as it was too expensive, and would duplicate legal costs for such a short time frame. This seems like a silly way to do a deal especially if the building is performing well and the intent is CMHC right away (vendors will not wait to close).
20 years ago I did all conventional lending, 25% down, 1.3 DSCR, 25 year amortizations and the numbers worked well, and we are going to that model again. There is simply too much risk for investors to put all of their eggs in the CMHC basket. Why do I say this? Because they keep changing the rules as they go.
– Restricting the use of equity takeout’s.
– Requiring appraisals on purchases and refinances (never did before).
– Offering enticing products like MLI select that they have now increased premiums on, and increased premiums on standard CMHC loans at the same time.
– now refusing to fund unless existing debt is with a CMHC ‘approved’ lender, whatever that means, hence no BRRRR’s using a VTB which was a very popular way to do a deal.
What will CMHC change, remove next?
In short, if your business plan depends on a refinance with CMHC this is an especially risky proposition in today’s marketplace. You are essentially relying on the government to be a partner with you when their best interests do not align with investors. There is a place with CMHC financing in multifamily of course, but it should not be the go-to method and I don’t believe it will be going forward.